<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19022</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a fresh assessment made following the setting aside of an earlier assessment under the Income-tax Act should be considered a &quot;regular assessment.&quot; Interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was deemed exigible up to the date of the fresh assessment. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, concluding that interest should be levied in such circumstances, contrary to the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19022</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a fresh assessment made following the setting aside of an earlier assessment under the Income-tax Act should be considered a &quot;regular assessment.&quot; Interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was deemed exigible up to the date of the fresh assessment. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, concluding that interest should be levied in such circumstances, contrary to the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>