https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383279 The AAR-TN dismissed an advance ruling application as withdrawn after the applicant requested withdrawal, stating they opted to drop their proposed business model. The application concerned classification of repair and replacement services, whether they constituted principal or composite supply, and GST registration requirements under sections 22 and 25 of CGST Act 2017 for warehouse operations. The applicant failed to submit promised documents but was given a final hearing opportunity before formally requesting withdrawal. en-us Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:16:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383279 The AAR-TN dismissed an advance ruling application as withdrawn after the applicant requested withdrawal, stating they opted to drop their proposed business model. The application concerned classification of repair and replacement services, whether they constituted principal or composite supply, and GST registration requirements under sections 22 and 25 of CGST Act 2017 for warehouse operations. The applicant failed to submit promised documents but was given a final hearing opportunity before formally requesting withdrawal. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383279