<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 971 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383275</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESI is deductible only if credited to the relevant fund within the prescribed due date under the Income-tax Act; delayed deposit renders the deduction inadmissible, and the Tribunal was in applying the settled precedent against the assessee. The Court also held that, for the purpose of the fifteen-day deposit period under the provident fund law, the relevant month is the month for which wages are payable, not the date of actual salary disbursement, so the assessee&#039;s contrary argument failed. No error of law was found in the Tribunal&#039;s order, and interference was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 09:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 971 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383275</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESI is deductible only if credited to the relevant fund within the prescribed due date under the Income-tax Act; delayed deposit renders the deduction inadmissible, and the Tribunal was in applying the settled precedent against the assessee. The Court also held that, for the purpose of the fifteen-day deposit period under the provident fund law, the relevant month is the month for which wages are payable, not the date of actual salary disbursement, so the assessee&#039;s contrary argument failed. No error of law was found in the Tribunal&#039;s order, and interference was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>