https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383262 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax of &8377; 64,25,449/- for the period 2008-09 to 2011-12 against the appellant, who failed to pay despite collecting it from clients. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to deliberate suppression of facts. Penalties under various sections of the Act were imposed and upheld, with the appellant's arguments for waiver and balance sheet interpretation rejected. The appellant's intentional non-compliance led to dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the deliberate evasion of tax obligations. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:50:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383262 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax of &8377; 64,25,449/- for the period 2008-09 to 2011-12 against the appellant, who failed to pay despite collecting it from clients. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to deliberate suppression of facts. Penalties under various sections of the Act were imposed and upheld, with the appellant's arguments for waiver and balance sheet interpretation rejected. The appellant's intentional non-compliance led to dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the deliberate evasion of tax obligations. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383262