https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383261 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the confirmation of a demand under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act 1994, amounting to Rs. 56,45,623, along with interest and penalties. The appellant's services were classified as "Works Contract Service," exempting them from service tax liability for the period before 01.06.2007. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's tax calculations but did not address the limitation period issue, as the appellant's non-liability for service tax under Works Contract Service was deemed sufficient to allow the appeal. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383261 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the confirmation of a demand under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act 1994, amounting to Rs. 56,45,623, along with interest and penalties. The appellant's services were classified as "Works Contract Service," exempting them from service tax liability for the period before 01.06.2007. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's tax calculations but did not address the limitation period issue, as the appellant's non-liability for service tax under Works Contract Service was deemed sufficient to allow the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383261