https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383255 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order-in-appeal and allowing the appeal. It found that the appellant correctly availed benefits under Notification No. 214/86-CE for manufacturing HTC wagons on a job work basis, without wrongfully invoking Notification No. 10/97-CE. The Tribunal determined that the appellant complied with exemption conditions and did not violate any rules, as the principal manufacturer availed benefits under Notification No. 10/97-CE. Consequently, the demand for central excise duty was deemed legally unsustainable. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383255 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order-in-appeal and allowing the appeal. It found that the appellant correctly availed benefits under Notification No. 214/86-CE for manufacturing HTC wagons on a job work basis, without wrongfully invoking Notification No. 10/97-CE. The Tribunal determined that the appellant complied with exemption conditions and did not violate any rules, as the principal manufacturer availed benefits under Notification No. 10/97-CE. Consequently, the demand for central excise duty was deemed legally unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383255