<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 18,90,250/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued was found to be defective for not specifying the charge against the assessee. Relying on the principle favoring the assessee when there are conflicting views, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 18,90,250/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the notice issued was found to be defective for not specifying the charge against the assessee. Relying on the principle favoring the assessee when there are conflicting views, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>