<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1449 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues back for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the application of the real income theory and the need for consistent treatment of similar cases. The appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration in light of relevant Supreme Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1449 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues back for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the application of the real income theory and the need for consistent treatment of similar cases. The appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration in light of relevant Supreme Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>