<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19017</link>
    <description>Mandi fee and Nirashrit Shulk were treated as fees for services rendered by the mandi to traders and users of the facility, rather than as tax or duty merely because payment was compulsory. On that basis, the issue under section 43B did not turn on a legal characterization that generated a referable question of law. The point had already been considered by the appellate authorities and the Tribunal, and the proposed reference was also unsupported because the issue was not shown to have been raised before the Tribunal. No referable question of law arose, so the request to direct a reference was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19017</link>
      <description>Mandi fee and Nirashrit Shulk were treated as fees for services rendered by the mandi to traders and users of the facility, rather than as tax or duty merely because payment was compulsory. On that basis, the issue under section 43B did not turn on a legal characterization that generated a referable question of law. The point had already been considered by the appellate authorities and the Tribunal, and the proposed reference was also unsupported because the issue was not shown to have been raised before the Tribunal. No referable question of law arose, so the request to direct a reference was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>