<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1666 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282079</link>
    <description>ITAT JAIPUR (AT) held that revision under section 263 was not justified. The AO had conducted a detailed enquiry and accepted the cost of construction and fixed assets supported by records and a valuation report; reference to the DVO is not mandatory once the AO is satisfied. The Pr. CIT merely set aside the AO&#039;s order for referral without reaching a contrary conclusion, so the AO&#039;s order could not be deemed erroneous or prejudicial. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1666 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282079</link>
      <description>ITAT JAIPUR (AT) held that revision under section 263 was not justified. The AO had conducted a detailed enquiry and accepted the cost of construction and fixed assets supported by records and a valuation report; reference to the DVO is not mandatory once the AO is satisfied. The Pr. CIT merely set aside the AO&#039;s order for referral without reaching a contrary conclusion, so the AO&#039;s order could not be deemed erroneous or prejudicial. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>