https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282057 Medical evidence of hospitalization and surgery did not by itself establish sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, because the petitioner still had adequate opportunity to instruct counsel and pursue the appeal. The delay was also left unexplained after the certified copies became available, and the application for copies was filed only after the appeal period had expired. The article further states that revisional interference with an order refusing condonation is limited to illegality or material irregularity, not merely a different view on sufficiency of cause. On those grounds, the refusal to condone delay was upheld as free from jurisdictional error. en-us Thu, 23 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:05:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282057 Medical evidence of hospitalization and surgery did not by itself establish sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, because the petitioner still had adequate opportunity to instruct counsel and pursue the appeal. The delay was also left unexplained after the certified copies became available, and the application for copies was filed only after the appeal period had expired. The article further states that revisional interference with an order refusing condonation is limited to illegality or material irregularity, not merely a different view on sufficiency of cause. On those grounds, the refusal to condone delay was upheld as free from jurisdictional error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282057