<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 136 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282053</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the validity of State Government Notifications amending recruitment rules and promotions under the Mysore State Accounts Services. The High Court found the notifications unconstitutional, directing promotions under integrated service rules. It identified discrimination in promotional opportunities post-integration, emphasizing equality under Articles 14 and 16(1). The Supreme Court rejected new arguments, focusing on rational criteria for promotional disparities. It affirmed the High Court&#039;s ruling, stressing merit-based promotions and striking down unconstitutional discrimination, thereby upholding Constitutional guarantees of equality in promotions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 136 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282053</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the validity of State Government Notifications amending recruitment rules and promotions under the Mysore State Accounts Services. The High Court found the notifications unconstitutional, directing promotions under integrated service rules. It identified discrimination in promotional opportunities post-integration, emphasizing equality under Articles 14 and 16(1). The Supreme Court rejected new arguments, focusing on rational criteria for promotional disparities. It affirmed the High Court&#039;s ruling, stressing merit-based promotions and striking down unconstitutional discrimination, thereby upholding Constitutional guarantees of equality in promotions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>