https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282048 A statutory revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power affecting civil rights must record and disclose reasons, and a non-speaking revisional order is invalid. The High Court cannot cure that defect by examining file notings or supplying reasons not stated in the order. A prior mining lease grant made on a defective application is not a nullity merely for that reason, and questions of limitation, delay, and maintainability in revision must be decided by the revisional authority itself. The order under challenge was quashed and the revision remitted for fresh decision according to law. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:48:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282048 A statutory revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power affecting civil rights must record and disclose reasons, and a non-speaking revisional order is invalid. The High Court cannot cure that defect by examining file notings or supplying reasons not stated in the order. A prior mining lease grant made on a defective application is not a nullity merely for that reason, and questions of limitation, delay, and maintainability in revision must be decided by the revisional authority itself. The order under challenge was quashed and the revision remitted for fresh decision according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282048