<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 938 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383242</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the assessment back to the Assessing Officer for proper computation of deductions under Section 40(b)(iv) for both years post-discontinuance. The court held that the income post-discontinuance is taxable under Section 176(3A) and constitutes business income under Section 28, allowing deductions under Section 40(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 938 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383242</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the assessment back to the Assessing Officer for proper computation of deductions under Section 40(b)(iv) for both years post-discontinuance. The court held that the income post-discontinuance is taxable under Section 176(3A) and constitutes business income under Section 28, allowing deductions under Section 40(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>