<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 901 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s transactions under Rule 10A but set aside the demand for Central Excise duty due to the bar of limitation. The show cause notice was deemed legally unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 901 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s transactions under Rule 10A but set aside the demand for Central Excise duty due to the bar of limitation. The show cause notice was deemed legally unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>