<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 899 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and remanding the case for consideration on merits. The decision emphasized the importance of proper service procedures under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, requiring service by registered post with acknowledgment due. The lack of evidence confirming delivery of the Order-in-Original raised doubts about the validity of service, leading to the decision for reevaluation based on the appellant&#039;s claims of non-receipt and challenges to the service&#039;s validity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 899 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and remanding the case for consideration on merits. The decision emphasized the importance of proper service procedures under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, requiring service by registered post with acknowledgment due. The lack of evidence confirming delivery of the Order-in-Original raised doubts about the validity of service, leading to the decision for reevaluation based on the appellant&#039;s claims of non-receipt and challenges to the service&#039;s validity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>