<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 894 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383198</link>
    <description>The court directed that the impugned order should be treated as a show-cause notice, requiring the petitioner to deposit a percentage of the differential tax, submit objections, and undergo a reassessment process under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act. The court provided specific timelines and procedures for the revised assessment, concluding the writ petition with these directions and no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:41:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 894 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383198</link>
      <description>The court directed that the impugned order should be treated as a show-cause notice, requiring the petitioner to deposit a percentage of the differential tax, submit objections, and undergo a reassessment process under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act. The court provided specific timelines and procedures for the revised assessment, concluding the writ petition with these directions and no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>