<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 891 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383195</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order of issuance of process in Criminal Complaint Case, holding that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not complete due to the statutory restraint under Section 22A of SICA. The petition was allowed, and the order of issuance of process was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 891 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383195</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order of issuance of process in Criminal Complaint Case, holding that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not complete due to the statutory restraint under Section 22A of SICA. The petition was allowed, and the order of issuance of process was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>