<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2013 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2002-03 and A.Y. 2008-09, as the alleged mistakes were not considered apparent from the record and required detailed examination beyond the scope of rectification under section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal reiterated that its power is limited to rectifying obvious and patent mistakes and does not extend to reviewing or re-evaluating the substantive decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2013 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2002-03 and A.Y. 2008-09, as the alleged mistakes were not considered apparent from the record and required detailed examination beyond the scope of rectification under section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal reiterated that its power is limited to rectifying obvious and patent mistakes and does not extend to reviewing or re-evaluating the substantive decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>