<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1729 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282030</link>
    <description>Stay on outstanding demand was extended for six months or until disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier, on the same terms. The extension was granted because the assessee had complied with the earlier stay conditions, no delay in the pending appeal was attributable to the assessee, and the existing stay had already been granted in the course of the proceedings. The order preserved the earlier terms while continuing protection against recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1729 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282030</link>
      <description>Stay on outstanding demand was extended for six months or until disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier, on the same terms. The extension was granted because the assessee had complied with the earlier stay conditions, no delay in the pending appeal was attributable to the assessee, and the existing stay had already been granted in the course of the proceedings. The order preserved the earlier terms while continuing protection against recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>