<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282041</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the notice of reopening of assessment was unsustainable due to procedural irregularities, lack of genuine grounds, and insufficient justification for the allegations made by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of adherence to statutory requirements and the need for a valid basis supported by concrete evidence before initiating reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282041</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the notice of reopening of assessment was unsustainable due to procedural irregularities, lack of genuine grounds, and insufficient justification for the allegations made by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of adherence to statutory requirements and the need for a valid basis supported by concrete evidence before initiating reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>