https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282028 The appellant's contentions regarding the infraction of Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of COFEPOSA, non-consideration of representation by the Central Government, delay in disposing of the representation, and additional grounds not raised in the High Court were rejected by the Court. The Court found no merit in the appellant's arguments, emphasizing that the statutory time limit for serving grounds of detention was met and that the Detaining Authority had applied its mind. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:26:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282028 The appellant's contentions regarding the infraction of Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of COFEPOSA, non-consideration of representation by the Central Government, delay in disposing of the representation, and additional grounds not raised in the High Court were rejected by the Court. The Court found no merit in the appellant's arguments, emphasizing that the statutory time limit for serving grounds of detention was met and that the Detaining Authority had applied its mind. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282028