<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 33 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18990</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the Revenue against the assessee, denying the deduction under section 35B(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee-firm did not qualify as an industrial undertaking eligible for the deduction, citing similarities with a prior case involving Dhandia Gems Corporation. The court concluded that the assessee did not substantiate that the goods were manufactured by a small-scale industrial undertaking, leading to the disallowance of the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 33 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18990</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the Revenue against the assessee, denying the deduction under section 35B(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee-firm did not qualify as an industrial undertaking eligible for the deduction, citing similarities with a prior case involving Dhandia Gems Corporation. The court concluded that the assessee did not substantiate that the goods were manufactured by a small-scale industrial undertaking, leading to the disallowance of the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>