https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18989 Disputed questions of fact in recovery proceedings under income-tax were held unsuitable for writ adjudication, so the court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the demand and show-cause notices and directed the petitioner to pursue remedies before the competent authority. The petitioner's pending representation to the Tax Recovery Officer, if still undecided, was ordered to be disposed of within three months from presentation of a certified copy of the order. Because the court did not entertain the writ on merits and required administrative disposal of the representation, the interim stay previously granted was vacated. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:23:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18989 Disputed questions of fact in recovery proceedings under income-tax were held unsuitable for writ adjudication, so the court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the demand and show-cause notices and directed the petitioner to pursue remedies before the competent authority. The petitioner's pending representation to the Tax Recovery Officer, if still undecided, was ordered to be disposed of within three months from presentation of a certified copy of the order. Because the court did not entertain the writ on merits and required administrative disposal of the representation, the interim stay previously granted was vacated. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18989