<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cross-examination of tempo driver in clandestine removal case not repeated, aligns with natural justice principles.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48027</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was already allowed earlier and therefore there was no reason for the adjudicating authority to grant cross examination again and again and cannot be considered to be violative of principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:01:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-examination of tempo driver in clandestine removal case not repeated, aligns with natural justice principles.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48027</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was already allowed earlier and therefore there was no reason for the adjudicating authority to grant cross examination again and again and cannot be considered to be violative of principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:01:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>