<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 875 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s addition of INR 7,000,000 under Section 68 for unexplained share capital and the consequent addition of INR 1,22500/- for commission. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions and the identity and creditworthiness of the shareholders, as required by law. The AO&#039;s additions were deemed justified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 875 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s addition of INR 7,000,000 under Section 68 for unexplained share capital and the consequent addition of INR 1,22500/- for commission. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions and the identity and creditworthiness of the shareholders, as required by law. The AO&#039;s additions were deemed justified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>