<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 867 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the deletion of the additions made by the AO for both AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and the necessity of concrete evidence to support any claims of fictitious transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscored the need for the AO to provide specific evidence and allow the assessee the opportunity to rebut such evidence, rather than relying on general reports and suspicions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 867 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the deletion of the additions made by the AO for both AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and the necessity of concrete evidence to support any claims of fictitious transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscored the need for the AO to provide specific evidence and allow the assessee the opportunity to rebut such evidence, rather than relying on general reports and suspicions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>