<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 860 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383164</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) Orders regarding the addition of unexplained cash deposits and agricultural income for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The appeals were dismissed as the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence or arguments to support further relief. The relief granted by the CIT(A) was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed due to the lack of justification for modifying the original orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 860 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383164</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) Orders regarding the addition of unexplained cash deposits and agricultural income for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The appeals were dismissed as the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence or arguments to support further relief. The relief granted by the CIT(A) was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed due to the lack of justification for modifying the original orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>