<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 858 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383162</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) declared by the assessee and deleted the consequential addition. The tribunal found that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) lacked concrete evidence to disprove the genuineness of the transactions, emphasizing the need for an independent investigation. The order was pronounced in open court on 12.06.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 858 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383162</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) declared by the assessee and deleted the consequential addition. The tribunal found that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) lacked concrete evidence to disprove the genuineness of the transactions, emphasizing the need for an independent investigation. The order was pronounced in open court on 12.06.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>