<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 31 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18983</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the wealth-tax cases as the right to wear jewelry was not considered an asset under the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision that no question of law arose was deemed erroneous, leading to the cases being brought before the court by the Revenue. The judgment was delivered by SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI J. and S. PARVATHA RAO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 31 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18983</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the wealth-tax cases as the right to wear jewelry was not considered an asset under the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision that no question of law arose was deemed erroneous, leading to the cases being brought before the court by the Revenue. The judgment was delivered by SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI J. and S. PARVATHA RAO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>