<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 837 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383141</link>
    <description>Jurisdictional objections to a complaint and summoning order were raised on the basis that the investigation had been transferred and the company had later cooperated. The Punjab and Haryana High Court did not decide the merits of the quashing request and instead disposed of the writ petition without final adjudication, recording the undertaking that the complaint would be withdrawn after the transfer of investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:59:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 837 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383141</link>
      <description>Jurisdictional objections to a complaint and summoning order were raised on the basis that the investigation had been transferred and the company had later cooperated. The Punjab and Haryana High Court did not decide the merits of the quashing request and instead disposed of the writ petition without final adjudication, recording the undertaking that the complaint would be withdrawn after the transfer of investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>