<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 820 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383124</link>
    <description>Pending delay condonation and stay applications in a statutory appeal may justify limited interim protection to prevent recovery proceedings from rendering the appeal ineffective. The Kerala High Court directed the appellate authority to dispose of the pending applications expeditiously and granted a short restraint on coercive recovery steps until consideration of those applications. The writ petition was disposed of on that limited protective basis, without deciding the merits of the assessment challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 820 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383124</link>
      <description>Pending delay condonation and stay applications in a statutory appeal may justify limited interim protection to prevent recovery proceedings from rendering the appeal ineffective. The Kerala High Court directed the appellate authority to dispose of the pending applications expeditiously and granted a short restraint on coercive recovery steps until consideration of those applications. The writ petition was disposed of on that limited protective basis, without deciding the merits of the assessment challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>