https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282016 The Tribunal partially allowed the Resolution Professional's application, excluding the initial three days but rejecting the exclusion of the subsequent 31 days for the computation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision underscored the significance of timely appointments and adherence to guidelines for consistency and fairness in resolution processes. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jul 2019 06:23:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282016 The Tribunal partially allowed the Resolution Professional's application, excluding the initial three days but rejecting the exclusion of the subsequent 31 days for the computation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision underscored the significance of timely appointments and adherence to guidelines for consistency and fairness in resolution processes. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282016