<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 563 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282005</link>
    <description>Proceedings under Section 50A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act for framing, amalgamating, or modifying a trust scheme do not abate on the death of one applicant, because the power is a statutory, public-oriented function of the Charity Commissioner and is not dependent on every applicant remaining on record. Procedural rules cannot defeat that power through ordinary civil abatement principles. Rule 7 of the Bombay Public Trusts Rules and the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act do not import the Civil Procedure Code as controlling procedure for Section 50A inquiries, so delayed or absent substitution does not bar continuation of the proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 563 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282005</link>
      <description>Proceedings under Section 50A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act for framing, amalgamating, or modifying a trust scheme do not abate on the death of one applicant, because the power is a statutory, public-oriented function of the Charity Commissioner and is not dependent on every applicant remaining on record. Procedural rules cannot defeat that power through ordinary civil abatement principles. Rule 7 of the Bombay Public Trusts Rules and the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act do not import the Civil Procedure Code as controlling procedure for Section 50A inquiries, so delayed or absent substitution does not bar continuation of the proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>