<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 7 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18968</link>
    <description>A reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was held unavailable where the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject penalty under section 271(1)(c) rested on a pure finding of fact. The proposed questions merely challenged the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of the material on record and did not disclose any referable question of law. On that basis, the court treated the application as not maintainable and refused to direct a reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 7 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18968</link>
      <description>A reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was held unavailable where the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject penalty under section 271(1)(c) rested on a pure finding of fact. The proposed questions merely challenged the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of the material on record and did not disclose any referable question of law. On that basis, the court treated the application as not maintainable and refused to direct a reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>