<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 815 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383119</link>
    <description>Shifting, dismantling and raising existing transmission lines for highway widening was not treated as an asset transfer or taxable supply under GST because the work did not involve transfer of goods or services by the applicant to the electricity authority in the manner required for consideration-based taxation. The cost of the modification was borne by the applicant for safe clearances in highway development, while supervisory and shut-down charges levied by the electricity authority remained separately taxable. The constructed transmission lines were treated as immovable property, so the deeming provision for transfer of business assets did not apply. GST was therefore not payable on the cost estimate basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 815 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383119</link>
      <description>Shifting, dismantling and raising existing transmission lines for highway widening was not treated as an asset transfer or taxable supply under GST because the work did not involve transfer of goods or services by the applicant to the electricity authority in the manner required for consideration-based taxation. The cost of the modification was borne by the applicant for safe clearances in highway development, while supervisory and shut-down charges levied by the electricity authority remained separately taxable. The constructed transmission lines were treated as immovable property, so the deeming provision for transfer of business assets did not apply. GST was therefore not payable on the cost estimate basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>