<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the correct application of Rule 3(3)(a) for valuation purposes and rejecting the inappropriate reliance on Rule 3(3)(b) and profit margin considerations. The appeal was allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:42:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the correct application of Rule 3(3)(a) for valuation purposes and rejecting the inappropriate reliance on Rule 3(3)(b) and profit margin considerations. The appeal was allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>