<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that royalty charges and franchisee fees should not be included in the assessable value for customs duty as they were for post-importation activities. The Tribunal also found the demand to be time-barred and penalties imposed on the appellants were not sustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that royalty charges and franchisee fees should not be included in the assessable value for customs duty as they were for post-importation activities. The Tribunal also found the demand to be time-barred and penalties imposed on the appellants were not sustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>