<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 769 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax paid at Kolkata for transportation to Jaipur branch was in compliance with the Service Tax Act and Rules. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 769 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax paid at Kolkata for transportation to Jaipur branch was in compliance with the Service Tax Act and Rules. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>