<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 768 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal due to the absence of malafide intent in claiming cenvat credit and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation. The judgment emphasized the significance of maintaining proper records, timely compliance, and adherence to legal provisions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 768 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal due to the absence of malafide intent in claiming cenvat credit and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation. The judgment emphasized the significance of maintaining proper records, timely compliance, and adherence to legal provisions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>