<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18960</link>
    <description>Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 confines the appropriate authority to a limited statutory function: it may order purchase of the immovable property under section 269UD within the prescribed time, or, if no such order is made, it must issue the certificate under section 269UL(3). The authority cannot treat the statement under section 269UC as non est or examine the legality of the proposed transfer by reference to alleged breach of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The absence of prior permission under that Act did not authorise refusal of the statutory certificate, and the no-objection certificate became mandatory when no purchase order was made in time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:00:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18960</link>
      <description>Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 confines the appropriate authority to a limited statutory function: it may order purchase of the immovable property under section 269UD within the prescribed time, or, if no such order is made, it must issue the certificate under section 269UL(3). The authority cannot treat the statement under section 269UC as non est or examine the legality of the proposed transfer by reference to alleged breach of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The absence of prior permission under that Act did not authorise refusal of the statutory certificate, and the no-objection certificate became mandatory when no purchase order was made in time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>