<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 763 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 12,33,291/- by the Commissioner of CGST &amp; Central Excise &amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Nagpur. It held that technical discrepancies in invoices, if corrected, do not invalidate credit. The Tribunal recognized the legitimacy of credit for services used in manufacturing, even when tax is paid through intermediaries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 763 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 12,33,291/- by the Commissioner of CGST &amp; Central Excise &amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Nagpur. It held that technical discrepancies in invoices, if corrected, do not invalidate credit. The Tribunal recognized the legitimacy of credit for services used in manufacturing, even when tax is paid through intermediaries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>