<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 44 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18956</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer a reframed question to determine whether the assessee, engaged in a hotel business, was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of considering factual findings in legal interpretations and the need for a comprehensive analysis of the actual processes involved in determining entitlement to investment allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 44 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18956</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer a reframed question to determine whether the assessee, engaged in a hotel business, was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of considering factual findings in legal interpretations and the need for a comprehensive analysis of the actual processes involved in determining entitlement to investment allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>