<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18952</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal determined that the assessee should be considered a specified Hindu undivided family due to the wife&#039;s taxable wealth and her status as a family member, even though she was not a coparcener. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with legal precedents and Hindu law provisions, establishing that a Hindu undivided family can exist with only one male coparcener. As a result, the reference was decided in favor of the Revenue against the assessee for the assessment year 1976-77 under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18952</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal determined that the assessee should be considered a specified Hindu undivided family due to the wife&#039;s taxable wealth and her status as a family member, even though she was not a coparcener. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with legal precedents and Hindu law provisions, establishing that a Hindu undivided family can exist with only one male coparcener. As a result, the reference was decided in favor of the Revenue against the assessee for the assessment year 1976-77 under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>