<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 746 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection filed by the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions for unexplained sundry creditors and unexplained loan. The Tribunal directed the AO to estimate the net profit at 0.80% instead of 1%, emphasizing the need for thorough verification before making additions based on &quot;preponderance of probability.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 746 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection filed by the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions for unexplained sundry creditors and unexplained loan. The Tribunal directed the AO to estimate the net profit at 0.80% instead of 1%, emphasizing the need for thorough verification before making additions based on &quot;preponderance of probability.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>