<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 2 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18948</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, holding that the subsidy need not be deducted for depreciation under section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the court determined that both preliminary expenses and the government subsidy should be included in the computation of capital employed for relief under section 80J of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 2 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18948</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, holding that the subsidy need not be deducted for depreciation under section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the court determined that both preliminary expenses and the government subsidy should be included in the computation of capital employed for relief under section 80J of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>