<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 733 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the zinc scrap, which emerged as waste in the manufacturing process, could not be considered as consciously manufactured goods. Therefore, the demand for 6% of the value of the zinc scrap, along with interest and penalties, was set aside. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions to support this interpretation and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 733 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the zinc scrap, which emerged as waste in the manufacturing process, could not be considered as consciously manufactured goods. Therefore, the demand for 6% of the value of the zinc scrap, along with interest and penalties, was set aside. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions to support this interpretation and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>