<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 728 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383032</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad found the differential duty demand unsustainable due to insufficient evidence to refute the exporter&#039;s declaration of Iron Ore Fines&#039; Fe content below 62%. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. The decision emphasized the significance of authentic sample collection, clarity in test reports, and adherence to natural justice principles in customs proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 728 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383032</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad found the differential duty demand unsustainable due to insufficient evidence to refute the exporter&#039;s declaration of Iron Ore Fines&#039; Fe content below 62%. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. The decision emphasized the significance of authentic sample collection, clarity in test reports, and adherence to natural justice principles in customs proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>