<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18946</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to deny a public limited company&#039;s deduction claim of Rs. 13,601 for embezzlement during the relevant accounting year. The court found insufficient evidence to establish the embezzlement as a loss in the business, noting the lack of concrete proof and inconsistencies in the assessee&#039;s case. The absence of documentation regarding financial transactions with the employee and the outcome of legal proceedings led to the dismissal of the deduction claim. The court ruled in favor of the Income-tax Officer, emphasizing the failure to prove the loss within the business operations during the relevant accounting year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18946</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to deny a public limited company&#039;s deduction claim of Rs. 13,601 for embezzlement during the relevant accounting year. The court found insufficient evidence to establish the embezzlement as a loss in the business, noting the lack of concrete proof and inconsistencies in the assessee&#039;s case. The absence of documentation regarding financial transactions with the employee and the outcome of legal proceedings led to the dismissal of the deduction claim. The court ruled in favor of the Income-tax Officer, emphasizing the failure to prove the loss within the business operations during the relevant accounting year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>