https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383024 Writ jurisdiction was declined in this fiscal dispute because the challenge to TDS-related assessment and consequential attachment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 raised factual issues about non-production of supporting documents and compliance with Section 13 and Rule 9. As an effective statutory appeal under Section 51 was available, and the dispute was better examined by the appellate authority, the Court applied the rule of alternate remedy with greater rigour in tax matters. The impugned orders were left undisturbed, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:58:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383024 Writ jurisdiction was declined in this fiscal dispute because the challenge to TDS-related assessment and consequential attachment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 raised factual issues about non-production of supporting documents and compliance with Section 13 and Rule 9. As an effective statutory appeal under Section 51 was available, and the dispute was better examined by the appellate authority, the Court applied the rule of alternate remedy with greater rigour in tax matters. The impugned orders were left undisturbed, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383024